|
|
The statement in question is based on certain facts. Ordinals was established at the end of 2022 and struggled to gain significant attention until the introduction of BRC20 tokens by its founder, Domo (@domo). This introduction led to a significant increase in liquidity within the Ordinals ecosystem, benefiting NFTs and inscriptions, resulting in skyrocketing NFT prices.
The appeal of BRC20 lies in its simplicity and elegance. It only requires a decentralized indexing client, enabling contract rules and execution to take place off-chain while maintaining verifiability on-chain. This approach unlocks numerous possibilities and aligns with the community's current focus on advancing decentralized indexing or verification clients.
Now, let's explore Taproot Assets:
To understand the context better, it's essential to grasp three fundamental concepts:
UTXO (Unspent Transaction Output): This is a model used in Bitcoin, where coins are created when transactions are made. UTXOs consist of outputs (containing coin information and related scripts) and inputs (containing evidence to support script-controlled spending).
Hash Functions: These functions convert input values of any size into fixed-size values, providing data security.
Merkle Trees: In Bitcoin's Merkle tree structure, transactions are linked using a tree structure, ultimately producing a Merkle tree root. Only the root information needs to be written on the blockchain, rather than all transactions. This concept is crucial to the design of Taproot Assets.
Taproot Assets were developed by Lightning Lab (@lightning) and represent an upgraded version of the previous Taro project. The key technical feature of Taproot Assets can be summarized as follows:
Taproot Assets Technical Features:
By leveraging hash functions and Merkle trees to provide proofs, Taproot Assets move the entire script control associated with related coins off-chain or retain only the execution part. This enables the creation of primary root assets, which can be of different types, internally transferable, and divisible.
Asset validation is required only by the recipient/holder, without the need for broadcasting to a full node. This approach can achieve more complex smart contracts, scenarios with no gas fees, and a stateless blockchain experience while ensuring security and rapid verification.
Both BRC20 and Taproot Assets appear to be pursuing a similar path of decentralized indexing or verification clients. The primary difference lies in their underlying models: BRC20 employs the UTXO native structure, while Taproot Assets have created a new paradigm.
Regarding Casey's statement, it likely reflects the growing interest in these technologies and their potential to offer enhanced security, scalability, and flexibility. Ultimately, the choice between these technologies may depend on specific use cases and community preferences. |
|
Post time 8-9-2023 10:10:53