Chelsea stops shopping? Not due to lack of money, but being targeted!

Iti911

helsea, who has been dominating the transfer market with high-profile moves in recent years, seems to be scaling back this year. The reason lies in the strict implementation of financial fair play policies by the Premier League starting this year. Several clubs have already been penalized, and Chelsea is under observation. Consequently, they are likely unable to make big-money transfers as in previous seasons.

Over the past two years, Chelsea made several iconic signings such as Enzo, Caicedo and Mudryk, each costing over 100 million euros. In addition to these, they spent significant amounts on other players, making Chelsea the highest-spending club in Europe for two consecutive years.

However, this spending spree is reaching its limit. Despite the owner's willingness to continue investing, the club's financial situation is nearing the red line. The Premier League's financial oversight body has put Chelsea on notice. If Chelsea continues reckless spending in the market, the Premier League will intervene and impose serious penalties.

Starting this year, the Premier League is rigorously enforcing financial fair play policies, resulting in penalties for several clubs including Everton. Therefore, Chelsea, known for their lavish spending, will certainly want to avoid becoming the next penalized club. Currently, Chelsea is seeking a top-class striker to strengthen their squad. However, top forwards are scarce and expensive, leading Chelsea to abandon pursuits like that of Osimhen due to budget constraints. Hence, this upcoming season, we may not see Chelsea making the same high-spending moves in the transfer market as before.

Jatin255

Roman Abramovich still has plenty of money left to spend, so Chelsea is certainly wealthy. Players like Enzo, Caicedo, and Mudryk, acquired for over 100 million euros each last year, signed long contracts, allowing the transfer fees to be spread out over time. This transfer window, many deals have been put on hold due to the European Championship, and things will likely pick up after its conclusion.

Currently, Chelsea has already spent money, notably 61 million euros to sign 17-year-old Brazilian prodigy Estevão. This signing is undoubtedly a high-risk, high-reward move. Being only 17, he could develop into a stellar player, or he could fail to live up to expectations, similar to Barcelona's purchase of Brazilian youngster Roque, which turned out disappointing.

Chelsea has the money and the willingness to spend. As a top-tier club, they have considerable experience in navigating around Financial Fair Play regulations. Look at Manchester City, who have spent even more money without repercussions from the Football Association so far. If they want to punish Chelsea, they'll need to address Manchester City first.

I believe Chelsea will likely continue spending, but perhaps more prudently than last year, avoiding extravagant hundred-million-euro contracts. With a new coach, they need to stabilize the team after showing promise at the end of last season. For a strong team, falling from grace makes it incredibly difficult to rise again. Let's hope Chelsea achieves success in the upcoming season!

Jafar224

Chelsea scaling back their investments is also a good thing, as it shows a focus on prudent talent acquisition.

977Iti

Changes in policies or the broader environment mean even wealthy owners can no longer act recklessly. This also means the transfer market won't be as lively as before!

Is this so-called financial fair play policy by the Premier League really fair? Weren't they always advocating for market mechanisms and market-driven theories? Since transfers are market activities, why is the Premier League introducing such policies? Can't capital control them anymore?

Even the rich can't buy freely anymore because this invisible hand of the market is now being controlled by a visible hand—the authorities. Does this have a significant impact on the Premier League or even the global football community? For us, it means there won't be any more good deals to enjoy. Not fun at all!

At the same time, the impact of this policy on superstar players and wealthy clubs is truly disruptive. Are we going to have to settle for less now? Let's see how this unfolds.

Kapil334

Buying the right players is crucial, money isn't easy to come by. Stopping can be a good thing too—perhaps one day the savings can be used to buy the best!!

Shri

Chelsea's financial statements aren't very optimistic, from what I've gathered. Last year around this time, they were facing nearly £100 million in pre-tax losses. Fortunately, the team's operations have been relatively sound, with increasing match days and some growth in commercial revenue, pushing Chelsea's total income to £500 million. The club's fixed assets and player registrations also contributed to a profit of £150 million, offsetting operational costs to some extent.

Beyond men's football, Chelsea's women's team has performed well in competitions like the FA Cup and League Cup. Since the pandemic, Chelsea hasn't restricted ticket sales or matchday merchandise, consistently selling out at Stamford Bridge with an average attendance of over 40,000—a remarkable feat. While broadcast income decreased by nearly £10 million, it still rose compared to the previous year.

Reflecting on Abramovich's presence, it's clear how beneficial it has been since he took over Chelsea. Initiatives like the foundation created with input from UN agencies and global charities have greatly supported the club's operations over the years. Chelsea owes much of its survival and success to Abramovich's stewardship.

Currently refraining from player acquisitions might be prudent given the inflated transfer market. If they are pursued, it will depend on senior management's ability to navigate these high demands. Looking at Manchester City, seemingly untouchable despite global scrutiny, emphasizes the importance of strategic management for Chelsea's sustainability.

Indra55

Nowadays, football is all about business. There are things inside that we, as ordinary people, don't understand, but it just hasn't been exposed yet.

Isha000

If they can't buy, what should Chelsea do?