Knoqnoq Forum: Everything You Want to Discuss, Most Discussed in India
Search
Reply: 4

Is the Warriors dynasty built on Durant?

[Copy link]

237

Threads

1017

Posts

8112

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
8112
Post time 28-9-2023 13:08:23 | Show all posts |Read mode
The Warriors have won four championships in just eight years since their first championship in 2015. Fans have been discussing the team's glory during the two consecutive championship years when they seemed unbeatable.

For a team, what's more important: a single dominant player or the winning culture and collective effort established by the entire team?

This question seems particularly fitting when discussing the relationship between Durant and the Warriors. Over the years, there has been ongoing debate about whether Durant was the key factor behind the Warriors' dynasty.

Different opinions in the American media on where the dynasty came from
Around May of last year, prominent American sports commentator A- Smith discussed Durant and Curry in a blog post, stating, "When these two were teammates on the Warriors, even their mothers knew Durant was the better player."

Whenever Durant and Curry are mentioned, A- Smith tends to emphasize Durant's importance. He has repeatedly said, "I will never deny the achievements of the Warriors and Curry's performance on the court. But you need to understand that without Durant, what do the Warriors have to counter LeBron? Remember, in 2015, the Cavaliers lost Love and Irving to injuries in succession."

However, A- Smith's views are not universally accepted. For example, during last year's NBA Finals, the American media StatMuse publicly compared Curry's stats against the Celtics with Durant's stats against the Celtics.

Shaquille O'Neal, the NBA legend, has also been generous in his praise of Curry. Regarding the comparison between Durant and Curry, he has repeatedly emphasized, "You need to know that Curry and Durant defeated LeBron together. Curry has beaten LeBron, and similarly, Curry has beaten Durant. There's no doubt about Curry's greatness."

But when it comes to the topic of the Warriors' dynasty, the mainstream view does not lean towards Durant. Durant appears more like a "super mercenary" who made the already strong Warriors look even more formidable.

In the end, did they mutually contribute to each other's success? Or was Durant merely the icing on the cake?

This post contains more resources

You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register

x
Reply

Use magic Report

644

Threads

1631

Posts

110K

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
16313
Post time 28-9-2023 13:20:08 | Show all posts
Since Durant could start his own dynasty, why did he come to the Warriors? Haha.
Reply

Use magic Report

166

Threads

500

Posts

4755

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
4755
Post time 28-9-2023 13:23:34 | Show all posts
Respect!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply

Use magic Report

214

Threads

1726

Posts

9249

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
9249
Post time 28-9-2023 14:35:33 | Show all posts
I think there's probably not much need for further discussion on this topic.
Reply

Use magic Report

165

Threads

880

Posts

5232

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
5232
Post time 28-9-2023 19:11:07 | Show all posts
The Warriors will probably erect a statue of Curry in the future.
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list