About a fact regarding Djokovic and Federer

Janak9955

When many people compare Djokovic and Federer, they often mention Federer's mononucleosis in 2007 and 2008, suggesting that it led to his decline at the age of 26-27 and his inability to defeat Djokovic. However, they overlook Djokovic's early gluten allergy. It was only during the 2010 Davis Cup that Djokovic was diagnosed with a severe and long-term gluten allergy, causing frequent breathing difficulties and severe physical limitations during matches. After resolving the gluten allergy issue, Djokovic reached his peak in 2011.

While Federer experienced a decline in strength after mononucleosis, it's worth noting that during his peak years, he faced Djokovic, who was dealing with a serious gluten allergy. After Djokovic addressed his gluten allergy in 2011, the dynamics shifted, and Djokovic gradually gained the upper hand. When comparing the two, it's important to consider these factors to ensure a fair assessment.

Isha000

His gluten sensitivity issue is certainly not as severe as you claim.

Kapil334

Are there still people saying Federer is better than Djokovic?

Shri333

Using Djokovic's match count and win rate as evidence of severity lacks logical connection; the two are not necessarily related.

Ritu13

One's idol is always the strongest.

Yamini003

These are all part of competitive sports.

Ritu77

Championships are the ultimate measure. Otherwise, anyone could say, "If not for health issues, I could have won 30 Grand Slams."