|
|
1. First, is this record important?
Objectively speaking, this record is the third most important criterion in evaluating the GOAT, following only Grand Slam titles and weeks at World No. 1 in terms of significance. It allows for a very straightforward comparison of outstanding players across eras, including those from before the Open Era when Grand Slam tournaments weren't as prevalent. It's important to note that during the Connors and Laver eras, there didn't seem to be arrangements like the Masters Series, so Djokovic's achievements in important titles hold a unique place.
2. Does Djokovic need to deliberately pursue smaller tournaments for this record?
Not at all. Djokovic currently has at least 1 to 2 more years of winning titles at the Masters Series level and the ability to remain in the top ten for 3 to 4 years. However, there will come a time when Djokovic can't compete in deep rounds of Grand Slams and Masters Series tournaments, so playing some smaller tournaments is a very natural thing to do. Recent statements from Djokovic and Ivanisevic also make it clear that only significant health issues or the inability to maintain a top-ten ranking would lead to retirement. In my view, Djokovic's outstanding talent relative to Federer and Nadal is his ability to stay healthy. I believe he will follow a similar path as Agassi, gradually declining in competitive ability but maintaining good health as he transitions into retirement. |
|
Post time 17-9-2023 09:27:23