Knoqnoq Forum: Everything You Want to Discuss, Most Discussed in India
Search
Reply: 4

Museum's costly commission results in blank paper, artist unapologetic.

[Copy link]

191

Threads

923

Posts

5951

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
5951
Post time 27-9-2023 06:15:45 | Show all posts |Read mode
This Danish artist is truly a unique individual; he gave the world a controversial piece of art. The story begins with a commission from a museum. They paid him 350,000 Malaysian Ringgit to recreate two of his early works. The museum had high expectations for his artwork, but when he delivered it, he presented only two blank pieces of paper. Yes, you heard that right, just two blank sheets of paper.

It sounds like a scene from a comedy movie, but this actually happened. The people at the museum were initially dumbfounded, not sure whether to laugh or get angry. It was not only a waste of their money but also a betrayal of their expectations and trust. They paid 350,000 Malaysian Ringgit and got two blank canvases with nothing on them, like a joke. However, the artist, Hanning, had his own explanation. He said, "This piece is me taking their money. It's not theft; it's a breach of contract, and the breach is part of the work." Well, artists always seem to think outside the box. He encouraged other artists to do the same, regardless of what others might say; he was just being himself.

The museum was not satisfied with this outcome, so they took the matter to court. After a lengthy legal battle, the court eventually ruled that Hanning had to repay the 350,000 Malaysian Ringgit to the museum. This seems like a fair decision; after all, the money belonged to someone else, and it couldn't just be taken without consequences. This incident not only showcases the uniqueness and unconventional nature of modern art but also prompts us to think about the delicate balance between art and money, responsibility, and creativity. Hanning, in an interview, mentioned that he didn't plan to appeal. He said, "Thanks to the publicity from this event, the museum made more money than their initial investment."

It seems he didn't take the matter too seriously and saw it as an opportunity that brought more attention to art and museums. Perhaps, that's the charm of modern art - it always manages to broaden our horizons and defy conventional wisdom.
Reply

Use magic Report

605

Threads

1455

Posts

110K

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
17724
Post time 27-9-2023 09:48:07 | Show all posts
This artist was probably intentional, right? Fortunately, in the end, the money was returned.
Reply

Use magic Report

644

Threads

1631

Posts

110K

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
16313
Post time 27-9-2023 12:33:01 | Show all posts
Artists, you can't view them with normal people's thinking.
Reply

Use magic Report

214

Threads

1726

Posts

9249

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
9249
Post time 27-9-2023 14:54:00 | Show all posts
Indeed, to portray such rogue behavior with such a fresh perspective, only an artist could truly accomplish that!
Reply

Use magic Report

197

Threads

1302

Posts

5361

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
5361
Post time 27-9-2023 15:23:54 | Show all posts
Seeing this, I feel like responding with a blank post.
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list