Knoqnoq Forum: Everything You Want to Discuss, Most Discussed in India
Search
Reply: 3

Was allowing Rohit Sharma to bat in the 2nd Super Over a blunder?

[Copy link]

217

Threads

597

Posts

6051

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
6051
Post time 20-1-2024 11:07:58 | Show all posts |Read mode
In the third Twenty20 International at Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium, Rohit Sharma proved to be the difference between India and Afghanistan. It was thanks to Rohit (121*) that India was able to score 212 from 22/4. Rinku Singh did contribute, of course, scoring an incredible 69* off just 39 balls, but the Indian captain was the one who proved to the world that he still has a place in this format. He became the first cricket player to score a century in T20I for a fifth time. His work was far from done. In order to determine the winner on Wednesday, a double Super Over was required, so Rohit had to bat twice. As a result, Rohit became the first Indian player to bat three times in a global match.

Reply

Use magic Report

219

Threads

539

Posts

5903

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
5903
Post time 20-1-2024 11:23:23 | Show all posts
Umpires' decision on Rohit Sharma's 2nd Super Over batting raises questions. What's the ICC stance on 'retire out/hurt'?
Reply

Use magic Report

71

Threads

808

Posts

4306

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
4306
Post time 20-1-2024 11:39:24 | Show all posts
Curious about the umpires' call on Rohit Sharma's 2nd Super Over. ICC rules on 'retire out/hurt' should clarify.
Reply

Use magic Report

205

Threads

589

Posts

5711

Credits

Forum Veteran

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Credits
5711
Post time 20-1-2024 11:56:15 | Show all posts
Edited by gautam at 20-1-2024 11:58 AM

Did the umpires overlook something in allowing Rohit Sharma to bat again? ICC rules on 'retire out/hurt' might hold the answer.

                  
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list